Friday, December 26, 2008

All My Views (Un)Fit To Print: Respect The Rule Of Law

All My Views (Un)Fit To Print: Respect The Rule Of Law

CHRISTMAS MESSAGE

A Merry Christmas to one and all

It's a day when the world celebrates the birth of a teacher, pacifist and social thinker, regarded by some as an 'Avatar' of the Almighty, and by others as a 'prophet' .




Christmas brings with it the message of love and brotherhood.


Jesus, the teacher, told his followers that it was easy to love those who love you. The real proof of humanity was to show love to those who hate you. "Love your enemies", "Forgive those who hurt you", are the common tenets of Christianity, which is regearded as a 'pacific' religion by many.


My thoughts turn to the recent incidents after the Mumbai terrorist incident, and among the many eloquent voices, I would like to quote Ranjan Kamath:





".....ignorance of the rule of law begins with the rules of the road but does not end there.

No lawyer can refuse to defend an accused on the ground that the person is a terrorist as this would amount to misconduct under the Advocates Act, 1961. Refusal would render the lawyer liable for action under the Bar Council of India rules..."



Do click the link to read the entire article here

Thursday, December 25, 2008

It pays to steal a phone in India

This article appeared on the net
Thursday, 25 December , 2008, 12:47

The Department of Telecommunications (DoT), in a directive, has blocked phones that do not have an IMEI number. The 15-digit IMEI number is unique to every mobile handset, and even some satellite phones.
You can usually see it by typing *#06# on most branded phones.
This would mean that 25 million users of cheap Chinese knock-offs - that don't have IMEI numbers - might get disconnected on January 6, or March 31 if that gets extended. (If this directive had come two years ago, we wouldn't have to worry about millions of affected users.)

First, about 26/11. Maybe the terrorists did use Chinese phones. It makes little difference. The bigger issue was that they used legitimate SIM cards, bought with fake identity papers.

Second, some irony. While 25 million users of cheap Chinese handsets, most having bought them in good faith and without knowledge of IMEI numbers, will get disconnected, millions of cellphone thieves and their customers will continue with phones without fear of persecution by police or service provider.
The industry has developed software that can be uploaded to a phone, giving it a unique IMEI number, if it doesn't already have one. The software is being tested.
But the IMEI-less phone is not the only or even the main issue. As long as regular branded phones (with IMEI numbers) get stolen and re-used without trouble, terrorists can buy them much cheaper than the IMEI-free clone phones.
Because service providers are so reluctant to go after a thief, or a customer who bought a stolen phone, it's really quite safe to steal a phone in India.
Cellular Operators' Association of India (COAI) members' track record in tracking IMEI is poor.

A Wikipedia entry says this of the IMEI number: "It's used by the GSM network to identify valid devices and therefore can be used to stop a stolen phone from accessing the network. The owner whose phone is stolen can call his network provider and instruct it to block the phone using its IMEI number."

That is, if you lose your phone, you could call your network provider and it could block that IMEI number so it cannot be used with any other SIM card, or flag it as "hot".
'Could' is the operative word. Actually, the provider won't.
Its stance is: "We do not want to harass a customer who has bought a second-hand phone in good faith". Even if that phone is stolen.
Can you imagine that applying to cars? You buy a stolen car, and the authorities say, oh, poor fellow, let him keep it, he bought it in good faith?
Now, telcos might say the phone could be used on any other network, but in this day of roaming interconnect and settlement, tackling that is no big deal. A credit card company does not tell you that a lost card will be blocked only if the thief uses it on 'their network'.

Oh, and an Airtel or a Vodafone will not block a stolen phone even on their own network, unless they're pressured by the police.
If you thought things would be easier with CDMA (code division multiple access) providers, where there are no SIM cards to change, it's actually worse. Tata Indicom refused to block a very poor painter's phone, which was stolen; he finally had to change the number he had got printed on his card. He went through a police report, but no luck.

This, then, is the bigger danger, but the one that is easier to tackle.

The good news is that the police have begun to act on FIRs (first information reports) filed on stolen handsets. I know of a case in Delhi where a handset was recovered in a few days through the IMEI number. The bad news is that less than one in 10 phone thefts gets even reported, let alone an FIR registered.
So if directed by the police to track a stolen handset, the telecom companies can do it.
On March 31, 2009, they should block not only the IMEI-free handsets but also stolen handsets, after reporting theft (when a handset reported stolen turns up with another SIM card number, they can report that, before blocking it.)
And the COAI should create a database for stolen handsets that would get blocked, at least in India.
Self-regulation? I must be dreaming. So I hope the DoT issues the diktat to block stolen handsets along with IMEI-free handsets. This will put the squeeze on the grey market, on thieves, and, in a small way, on terror.
And the next time you lose a phone, take the trouble to report it to the police. You might just get it back, and deprive the grey market. Or a terrorist.

Saturday, December 06, 2008

Recovering

Thanksgiving Day was certainly an explosive one in India.
The terrorist attacks on Bombay's symbols of power and wealth
were plashed all over the news.
I'll post some of my views shortly.
Right now, I'm recovering.